Pittsburgh season-to-date: 4-4 ATS, 52.4% average bet share, 47.5% money share.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| ATS record (tracked games) | 4-4 |
| Average bet % | 52.4% |
| Average money % | 47.5% |
| Games as public favorite (60%+ bets) | 1 |
| ATS record as public favorite | 0-1 |
| Fade-the-public record (vs them as public fav) | 1-0 |
Pittsburgh don't have a strong public-vs-money pattern this season. Across the 8 games we've tracked, the average bet percentage on Pittsburgh is 52.4% and the average money percentage is 47.5%. Those are middle-of-the-pack numbers — bettors are split, dollars follow the bet count, and the line generally reflects the matchup rather than the public lean.
With 8 games on the board, the data is starting to mean something — and what it means is that Pittsburgh aren't a high-conviction fade or follow play. There's no consistent edge in either direction.
Watch the per-game splits below. Even balanced teams have individual games with meaningful divergence — that's where the daily roundups come in. See our methodology →.
Our advanced model rates every NCAAF game by expected value, using thousands of historical splits as the backbone. This week's highest-EV picks are reserved for subscribers.
Want a free look? See this week's biggest splits →
| Date | Matchup | Result | Pittsburgh bet % | Pittsburgh money % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-24 | Pittsburgh @ Miami (FL) | Failed to cover 23-52 (+20.5) | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| 2026-10-17 | Pittsburgh @ Boston College | Failed to cover 21-27 (-6) | 64.0% | 73.0% |
| 2026-10-10 | North Carolina @ Pittsburgh | Failed to cover 17-21 (-3.5) | 55.0% | 41.0% |
| 2026-10-02 | Pittsburgh @ Virginia Tech | Covered 35-33 (+1.5) | 54.0% | 35.0% |
| 2026-09-26 | Bucknell @ Pittsburgh | Covered 59-0 (-54.5) | 40.0% | 47.0% |
From publicly reported sportsbook handle, captured on a sub-hourly cadence for every FBS game from the moment a line is posted. The team figures use each game's closing snapshot — the last read before kickoff — so every number reflects what a bettor could actually have known.
When 60% or more of spread tickets land on Pittsburgh, they're 0-1 ATS this season. Books shade college lines toward the side they know the public wants, and on a board full of mismatches that shade is often the whole story.
A game counts only when it has a final score, a closing spread and a published split. An FCS opponent the source never priced, or a game whose splits were not captured before kickoff, is left out rather than guessed at.
1-0 ATS this season — the mirror of their public-favorite record, because the fade covers exactly when the public side doesn't. It's shown as a record rather than a recommendation; a handful of games is not a pattern.
On the games we've tracked this season, Pittsburgh draw 52.4% of spread tickets on average. College boards run lopsided — the popular side of a typical game holds about 82% of tickets — so a school has to live well above that to count as a public team, and a brand-name program usually does.
How we track public bets and money: see our methodology →
Last updated: October 30, 2026 at 5:47 AM UTC
Every game on the slate, ranked by public-vs-money divergence. Splits-based top opportunities, updated continuously. No signup, no paywall.
See all of this week's splits →