Pittsburgh Pirates at Chicago Cubs: market is roughly balanced — Chicago Cubs 74% of bets, 75% of money.
| Market | Side | Bet % | Money % | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moneyline | Pittsburgh Pirates | 26% | 25% | +135 |
| Chicago Cubs | 74% | 75% | -150 | |
| Run line | Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 | 19% | 27% | -166 |
| Chicago Cubs -1.5 | 81% | 73% | +160 | |
| Total | Over 6.5 | 85% | 83% | -120 |
| Under 6.5 | 15% | 17% | +102 |
Pittsburgh Pirates at Chicago Cubs looks like a balanced market right now. The bet count and the money share are tracking close together on the moneyline market — 74% of bets and 75% of dollars on Chicago Cubs, a 1-point gap that doesn't clear the threshold we treat as meaningful.
Even splits are the default state for most games on most nights. The public and the dollars agree that the line is roughly fair. There's no clean directional signal here — nothing to act on from a splits-only perspective. That doesn't make the game unpriced or uninteresting; it just means the public-vs-money lens isn't picking up an edge.
If you're shopping the slate for splits-driven plays, the bigger gaps live on the biggest splits today and sharp action today pages. See how we calculate splits →.
Our advanced model rates every MLB game by expected value, using thousands of historical splits as the backbone. Tonight's highest-EV picks are reserved for subscribers.
Want a free look? See tonight's biggest splits →
These are data displays. We don't issue picks. Use the splits to inform your own bets — and bet responsibly.
Sharp money is wagering activity from sophisticated, high-volume bettors. It shows up as a money percentage that exceeds the bet percentage on the same side. See our learn page for more.
Look for 15+ point gaps where the money is on the unpopular side. Those are the games where the average bet size is doing the talking.
Bet% is the share of tickets wagered on a side. Money% is the share of dollars. They diverge when one side draws bigger bets per ticket than the other.
Public favorites still win plenty of games — they are usually the better team. Where the public underperforms is against the spread on big-name teams in nationally televised games.
A 10-point gap between the share of bets and the share of dollars on a side is the threshold we treat as meaningful. 15+ points usually means the average bet on the money side is materially larger — that's where sharp money lives. See our methodology →
How we track public bets and money — see our methodology →
Last updated: May 27, 2026 at 9:43 PM UTC
Every game on the slate, ranked by public-vs-money divergence. Splits-based top opportunities, updated continuously. No signup, no paywall.
See all of tonight's splits →