Pittsburgh Pirates at Chicago Cubs: market is roughly balanced — Chicago Cubs 62% of bets, 60% of money.
| Market | Side | Bet % | Money % | Odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moneyline | Pittsburgh Pirates | 38% | 40% | +116 |
| Chicago Cubs | 62% | 60% | -130 | |
| Run line | Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 | 30% | 22% | -160 |
| Chicago Cubs -1.5 | 70% | 78% | +140 | |
| Total | Over 12.5 | 42% | 41% | -120 |
| Under 12.5 | 58% | 59% | -115 |
Pittsburgh Pirates at Chicago Cubs looks like a balanced market right now. The bet count and the money share are tracking close together on the moneyline market — 62% of bets and 60% of dollars on Chicago Cubs, a 2-point gap that doesn't clear the threshold we treat as meaningful.
Even splits are the default state for most games on most nights. The public and the dollars agree that the line is roughly fair. There's no clean directional signal here — nothing to act on from a splits-only perspective. That doesn't make the game unpriced or uninteresting; it just means the public-vs-money lens isn't picking up an edge.
If you're shopping the slate for splits-driven plays, the bigger gaps live on the biggest splits today and sharp action today pages. See how we calculate splits →.
Our advanced model rates every MLB game by expected value, using thousands of historical splits as the backbone. Tonight's highest-EV picks are reserved for subscribers.
Want a free look? See tonight's biggest splits →
We don't issue picks. The splits show what the public and the money are doing — use them to inform your own read of the game.
We aggregate publicly reported sportsbook handle on a sub-hourly cadence. See our methodology page for the full breakdown.
Any licensed sportsbook in your state offers MLB markets. We don't recommend specific books — see our responsible gambling resources before you wager.
Look for 15+ point gaps where the money is on the unpopular side. Those are the games where the average bet size is doing the talking.
A 10-point gap is the threshold we treat as noise vs. signal. 15+ points is meaningful — it usually means the average bet on the money side is materially larger than on the public side.
A 10-point gap between the share of bets and the share of dollars on a side is the threshold we treat as meaningful. 15+ points usually means the average bet on the money side is materially larger — that's where sharp money lives. See our methodology →
How we track public bets and money — see our methodology →
Last updated: May 27, 2026 at 9:43 PM UTC
Every game on the slate, ranked by public-vs-money divergence. Splits-based top opportunities, updated continuously. No signup, no paywall.
See all of tonight's splits →